Thinking BIM and FM

ThinkBIM is helping formulate industry thinking on BIM for FM, but we need more integrated, cross-disciplinary approaches.

It is now almost exactly two years since the UK government published its Construction Strategy committing to the adoption of BIM by 2016 (July 2011 launch), and gradually the thinking is becoming more joined up.

thinkBIMOver the past couple of years, I have helped, and occasionally talked, at ThinkBIM events organised by the Centre for Knowledge Exchange at Leeds Metropolitan University. Typically, the team organise a short series of ‘twilight’ meetings held in the late afternoon/early evening, culminating in a half-day event event – combining conference sessions, workshops and rapid-fire ‘Pecha Kucha’ presentations – to round off each series (a similar format is followed for CKE’s GreenVision events, which I also help with).

Think BIM workshop session, July 2012ThinkBIM has attracted some of the UK’s leading speakers on building information modelling, as well as international contributors. For example, the most recent event, held at WSP’s Leeds office in April, included contributions from UK BIM Task Group chair Mark Bew and BuildingSmart UK’s Nick Tune, plus a transatlantic contribution from a BIM practitioner in California (Nathan Wood of DPR Construct), with all the event content freely shared online. All have pushed the boundaries of BIM thinking; the 11 July 2012 event, for instance, one of the first to explore the implications of BIM for facilities managers.

BIM for FM

This has become an increasingly hot topic in the UK, particularly as client and owner-operator organisations begin to grapple with the implications of BIM for operation and maintenance throughout the life-cycle of a built asset (the BIM Task Group now has a BIM4FM grouping). This does not mean that FM uses a fully detailed BIM for OpEx purposes. BIM “In-use” retains some project information for operational facility management (eg: a database for managing geometric, parametric performance and associated document based information), but a large amount of information is archived. This may be recalled for reference by future projects, or if necessary, be used to resolve any issues should the facility not perform as specified or designed.

Asset users can also then potentially build new data sets that combine data about the physical asset with data about energy use, human interactions with the building, etc, and these will help when it comes to developing future projects. Too often clients may look at projects in isolation as one-offs – better to think about them as a series, with early projects informing the design, construction and future operation of later ones. A key tenet of the UK Government Soft Landings (GSL) is that “BIM will be progressively used as a data management tool to assist the briefing process” – to me, this means FM will have a strategic role in helping develop future projects for each organisation.

“Now BIM?”

More difficult is WIIFM – What’s in it for me? – regarding BIM for FM in existing buildings? BIM may be deployed on new-build projects and on major refurbishments and extensions of existing assets, but can BIM help owners/managers with their existing built assets? I was struggling with this until I saw Nick Blenkarn (Severn Partnerhip) show at the recent RICS Building Conference (post) how laser-scanning and the resulting point clouds could be used to create accurate BIMs of building interiors. These can then be retrospectively linked to databases detailing assets contained in those building spaces and used for computer-aided FM.

Coincidentally, I have had two totally separate but parallel conversations about BIM and CAFM recently, both with people from software organisations looking at what they see as the real world of BIM for FM – or, as one put, it “Now BIM” – and I have also noted a push from some SaaS collaboration vendors to incorporate both BIM and whole asset life-cycle thinking into their future product portfolios.

My fellow ThinkBIM ambassador Duncan Read went to the Facilities Show at Birmingham’s NEC last week, and (in his latest ThinkBIM blog post), identified little consensus on how to ‘do’ CAFM in an integrated way with BIM. But he did spot some:

“… pockets that are realising what BIM can offer to the FM industry and they are working hard to provide that seamless link between the software solutions [though], to make this work effectively, the design and construct businesses need to engage and understand the FM needs and requirements. [And] as ever … it’s not all about the software, though as ever it will have a part to play.”

These debates will continue at forthcoming ThinkBIM events, both twilight sessions and, notably, the next half-day conference on Wednesday 10 July 2013, featuring the return of Cabinet Office GSL leader Deborah Rowland (more details here).

Posted in AEC, BIM, Blogs, Collaboration, Functionality, Future, People issues, SaaS, Sustainability | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mclaren launches CAFM Explorer OnAir

The Facilities Show is at the NEC in Birmingham, UK this week (last day today) – a good place for firms to make announcements to their FM audiences. This week, for example, McLaren Software – describing itself as a provider of “engineering document control, project collaboration and CAFM (computer aided facilities management) solutions” – has announced the availability of CAFM Explorer OnAir.

McLaren-logoMcLaren acquired CAFM Explorer’s developer FMx last October for £5.6m, and in December I wrote about the company’s plans to expand the system’s web-based functionality and create a comprehensive hosted FM capability that also supports mobile working. Earlier last October, McLaren launched an ‘OnAir’ web-hosted version of its Enterprise engineering document system (post), and this week’s news is similar. According to the news release:

“McLaren CAFM Explorer ‘OnAir’ enables facility managers take full advantage of CAFM Explorer … without the need to procure, maintain or support internal IT systems.

“… The addition of CAFM Explorer to the McLaren ‘OnAir” service offers customers a choice of installing CAFM Explorer either on in house IT systems or on the McLaren’s OnAir cloud infrastructure for a single monthly fee. CAFM Explorer ‘OnAir’ users simply log onto the secure service via any supported desktop, laptop or mobile web browser.

“McLaren are also previewing McLaren CAFM Web at the Facilities Show 2013 at the NEC. CAFM Web, due for release later this year, is a new HTML 5 based interface for CAFM Explorer providing support for desktop, laptop and mobile devices.”

Environmental Resources Management (ERM), “a leading global provider of environmental, health, safety, risk, social consulting services and sustainability related services”, has been the first company to adopt CAFM Explorer OnAir.

Posted in Business/Financial, Functionality, Internet, Marketing, Mobile, SaaS, Sustainability, Vendors | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BIM for infrastructure event from Construct IT

ConstructIT-logoAfter yesterday’s post, a timely event announcement…. Construct IT, in partnership with Network Rail and COMIT, is holding its Spring event on Thursday, 20 June 2013 in Manchester, focusing on “Deriving value through BIM in the delivery of Infrastructure Projects“. Speakers include:

  • Nigel Jacques (Network Rail) on A Client’s Perspective: Deriving Strategic Value in the Rail Sector
  • Ann Kemp (Atkins & ICE BIM Action Group) on Who’s Driving BIM – Technology or the People? An Insight into Enhancing the Quality of Thinking and Driving Better Decision-making on Infrastructure Projects
  • Iain Miskimmin (Crossrail BIM Academy) on Final Barrier to BIM: Resolving the Cultural Issues in the Crossrail Information Management Academy
  • Paul Trethewey & Andy Powell (Parsons Brinckerhoff) on Collaboration — Cross-organisation Knowledge Transfer

The event is free to members of Construct IT and COMIT (£100 for others) and is CPD accredited – more details on the Construct IT website (click on ‘events’ in the left column, or follow the Spring Event; on the following page, click on the middle icon on the right to get to the registration page).

Posted in AEC, BIM, Collaboration, People issues | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Learning BIM at the Bentley Crossrail Academy

The Bentley Crossrail Academy is developing and promoting BIM best practice in the £15.9 billion London project’s supply chain that will be shared by other UK mega-projects.

Crossrail roundel

Recently, Iain MisKimmin (senior industry consultant at Bentley Systems UK, manager of its City of London-based Information Management Academy, and also one of the leading lights of COMIT), invited me to attend a half-day briefing at the Academy for contractors involved in the cross-London Crossrail project (Wikipedia article*). The session was aimed at staff with information management and document control roles on the various Crossrail contracts, briefing them about the Crossrail BIM vision and what they need to do to achieve it.

Academy background

The Academy was announced in February 2012. Crossrail has an Enterprise License Subscription (ELS) for Bentley’s application software portfolio covering the extended “Crossrail enterprise”, and the Academy was created to encourage and support use of Bentley’s BIM tools and related technologies to achieve Crossrail’s goals of efficiency, cost savings, and increased safety.

Accordingly, the briefing was jointly presented by personnel from Bentley and Crossrail, who stressed the whole project life-cycle needs of the scheme (a cause dear to the heart of Crossrail CEO Andrew Wolstenholme – as readers of his 2009 Constructing Excellence report Never Waste a Good Crisis [PDF] will know; we were even treated to a showing of the 1:5:200 model), the need to capture information about virtual assets as well as physical ones, supporting collaboration and ensuring a “single source of the truth”

Supporting a mega-project’s information needs

The briefing was structured to cover:

  • document and information management
  • management and control of design information
  • asset information provision
  • BIM in delivery

At the core of Crossrail’s document management strategy is an electronic document management system (EDMS), eB Web (Bentley’s enterprise Bridge; essentially, an intranet), which is accessible across the project’s supply chain and which provides a structured and systematic approach to ensure compliance with standards. We saw the depth of metadata captured about each item, the levels of control applied to allow different levels of access (view, modify, delete, etc), red-amber-green-grey colour coding for approval status, and the search capabilities within the system.

Design information is managed through a customised version of Bentley’s ProjectWise private cloud-based collaboration platform (adapted to include more support for utilities and geospatial requirements; essentially, the project’s extranet), currently enabling sharing of CAD data in a common format among some 1500 users. In 2009, the centralised system had 92,000 items stored; by June 2013 this was expected to reach 970,000, on the way to a an expected 1.5 million CAD files – shared by 2500 users – by August 2014. Similar naming/numbering conventions and metadata structures to those specified for eB Web have been created for the ProjectWise platform, alongside standardised common folder structures.

QR codes were discussed in relation to asset management – the training room had some white, yellow and stainless steel examples fastened to the wall – but the Crossrail project involves much more. A nuclear industry standard asset information management system, AIMS, has been deployed as part of the eB system to capture data (descriptions, serial numbers, etc) and to tag assets and equipments by location, classification and function. A Bentley ‘Asset Painter’ tool is being used to link asset tag information stored in eB Web and associate them with the relevant building information model files (I’d heard Crossrail’s Ross Dentten talk about this at an Ecobuild BIM seminar in March). Ultimately some 400 classes of data will be stored in the Uniclass-based system.

BIM in Delivery looked at three broad areas, each the subject of Crossrail task groups: modelling and clash detection; mobile tools; and annotating as-built data. I was most interested in the mobile area – this month (May 2013) Bentley and Crossrail are planning to roll-out QR codes for drawing authentication via mobile devices (similar to Unit4 Collaboration, post), to enable mobile access to downloaded and synchronised portfolios of electronic files via iPads (and other devices in due course), and to implement Formotus mobile electronic forms. We were also shown how special video-pens could be used to record digital mark-ups of drawings (printed on special paper), with automatic notifications sent to the drawings’ originators upon upload.

Forward-looking

Woolwich station box, February 2013I was involved with some PR activity relating to Crossrail when I worked at civil engineering consultancy Halcrow over 20 years ago, and it is gratifying to finally see it under construction (I visited the Woolwich station box, right, during an open day earlier this year). For a project so long in gestation, Crossrail has inevitably had to bridge the analogue-to-digital divide, and some of its systems were not in place on Day One, but the Academy is helping project participants join the client on this journey, with Bentley as the technology partner and facilitator of a common data environment.

Through the Academy, the project is also keen to share its learning with other client organisations (one of my fellow attendees was an engineer from the HS2 rail project, for example), and to help its supply chain and others make the transition towards integrated BIM accessible across multiple hardware platforms, and to support the full project life cycle (the London Tube network has been celebrating its 150th anniversary and the Bentley/Crossrail team stressed that its legacy of both physical and virtual assets would need to be around for at least as long).

(* Interested in civil engineering? Interested in Wikipedia editing? Building on a previous event, the ICE is planning a day you may be interested in…. Email me for further information.)

Posted in AEC, BIM, Collaboration, Extranet, Functionality, Future, SaaS, Vendors | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Conject CEO reclaims SaaS second place

conject-logoForget the investigations, an email has arrived from Conject CEO Colin Smith, mentioned in yesterday’s post about think project!, re-asserting the rival Munich, Germany-based group’s claim to be second largest SaaS vendor in the architecture, engineering, construction and operator space:

The answer to your question “has ThinkProject been able to overtake CONJECT?” is no.

At €17.17m [£14.53m or US$22.6m] our revenues were down, largely due to the difficulties in the FM portion of our business that we already discussed, but they were still €1.67m greater than ThinkProject for the same period. So sorry ThinkProject, nice try, but no cigar!

Looking underneath the headline figures,  gross order intake (a key indicator of future revenues for SaaS companies) during 2012 was €23.2m [£19.63m or US$30.53m] and for Q1 2013 grew even more, to €6.94m for the first three months. Our new SaaS FM product is now on full release in Germany, on-time as promised, and we have many new capabilities (including BIM) emerging from our development group over the coming year, plus several new regional offices to drive future organic revenue growth.

So to mis-quote Mark Twain “reports our our death have been greatly exaggerated” as we’ve never been in better shape!

These numbers do suggest that Conject has finally returned to growth after its flat, post-acquisition period. My own soundings had suggested that Conject had not suffered a such a dramatic dip, but think project’s German market leadership assertion may require a closer definition of what the two mean by German market and more detail of their geographical spread of revenues.

Update (16 May 2013) – I talked to think project!’s CEO Thomas Backmaier this afternoon, and he clarified his comparison. While very complimentary about Conject, he said his business’s revenues are almost solely (98%) focused on SaaS-based project collaboration, while he regarded Conject’s revenues as being drawn from a wider product portfolio, including facilities management – where some income is generated by in-house hosted (so non-SaaS) products – and cost management. In other words, he was making a distinction on a like-for-like basis.

Thomas went on to talk about recent wins in the Netherlands (major highway projects for BAM) and in Poland (a series of power plants) and said think project! had enjoyed growth of around 17% in the first four months of 2013. He was also keen to highlight the company’s development of mobile tools: Apple iOS and Android apps are being used for non-conformance reporting on offshore windfarm projects, for example.

Posted in AEC, Business/Financial, Collaboration, Functionality, Marketing, Mobile, SaaS, Telecoms, Uncategorized, Vendors | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

think project! 2012 revenues reach €15.5m

think project! GmbH, grew 17 percent in 2012, to €15.5m revenues, a figure it says puts it ahead of its Munich rival Conject.

Thinkproject-logoAccording to a news release, the Munich, Germany-based project platform provider think project! has been posting annual growth rates of 15-20% for some years, grew 17% in 2012, and its first quarter of 2013 saw revenues up 16%. This growth has come equally from new and existing customers, with general contractors, energy, automotive and public sector segments the strongest drivers.

With total 2012 revenues of €15.5m (that’s £13.05m or US$20.27m at today’s rates), the release says “think project! group is now market leader in Germany and number two worldwide” (a claim that may be contested by its Anglo-German rival Conject; I believe think project! regards Aconex as current number one). Thomas Bachmaier, CEO of think project! GmbH, says:

“We are delighted with business development in Germany and internationally. In addition to these positive figures, we have been continually expanding expertise in our principal customer segments. In turn, we pass this knowledge on to our customers to help them successfully operate their projects.

“In the product area, we set the right course early on with our collaboration cloud strategy, supplementing our strong core product with additional services. With integration of Adobe PDF for digital approval procedures and the app for mobile capture of data on construction sites, we offer an attractive and comprehensive solution for our customers, which we are actively enhancing. Our proven strategy is to continuously make technology innovations accessible to our customers to deliver tangible benefits.”

When I met (and visited) think project! last year, Thomas was talking of revenues around €15m, so the latest year-end result is consistent with this.

Conject endured a flat period while it assimilated the former BIW Technologies business – acquired in December 2010 – into the group and coped with the global recession. The first full year of operations under Conject ownership (2011) were “challenging” for the UK business, though things did apparently start to improve in 2012 (post). Meanwhile, Conject group CEO Colin Smith told me poor sales in the German FM business had also kept the group’s overall performance “flat” (post) – as BIW rebranded, Colin had been talking of group revenues in excess of €18m (post). Has it faltered to the extent that think project! has been able to overtake? (I am investigating….)

Posted in AEC, Business/Financial, Collaboration, Functionality, Marketing, SaaS, Vendors | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

iSite revenues flat in 2012

iSite PortalThe latest annual results from Styles & Wood Group plc, for the year to 31 December 2012, were published last week (RNS announcement).  This UK property support services group reported revenues down 3% and operating profit up 20%, while its Nottingham-based specialist IT business, iSite – which delivers SaaS-based construction and property management services – reported revenues of £1.466m (up slightly from £1.460m in 2011 – post) – and reflecting a better second-half of 2011 – post) and a drop in profit to £0.107m (from £0.278m in 2011), though this may well be accounted by the business’s higher employee overheads: it grew to 26 staff, from 19 in 2011.

A year ago, group CEO Tony Lenehan was talking about the cross-selling benefit to iSite (formerly known as StoreData) of being part of a contracting group, and the integrated offer to clients is highlighted; the results headlines include:

“Commissioned by both Lloyds Banking Group and Barclays to provide our full suite of property services and solutions including programme and projects delivery, design services and building intelligence support.”

iSite HubDuring the past year, in October 2012, iSite formally launched its ‘Hub’ service for asset management. While iSite Portal  is positioned as the group’s “building intelligence” system, ‘asset-ology’ and the FM award-winning ‘Hub’ (developed in partnership with Nationwide) takes it a stage further, helping companies who outsource to get a single consolidated view of all property and facilities information, both internal and across their supply chains. In the group’s annual report, its iSite description also touches on BIM:

iSite provides clients with technology based property information solutions that store, manage and communicate critical data relating to their property portfolio and associated property activities. This data can include design models, supplier allocations as well as project specific data.

Posted in AEC, BIM, Business/Financial, Collaboration, Extranet, Marketing, SaaS, Vendors | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Partnerships matter in SaaS collaboration market

Software-as-a-Service construction collaboration vendors will struggle to grow quickly unless they can build effective partnerships with complementary businesses who can help them reach new customers and projects without requiring direct sales team inputs. This message has been reinforced to me three times this week:

First, Anglo-German vendor Conject has congratulated UK-based contractor Mace on winning two awards in the 2013 Building Awards. This relationship dates back over a decade to when Conject were better known as BIW Technologies, and Mace was one of BIW’s early adopters. (In 2006, as BIW’s head of corporate communications, I cited Mace as a customer in the BIW entry to win “Entrepreneur of the Year” at that year’s edition of the Building Awards.)

Second, London-HQed Asite has continued to grow its international network of contractor users, signing a five-year agreement with Bangalore, India-based Synergy, which will use Asite’s Adoddle to provide cloud-based collaborative BIM software services for its capital project programme across India, the Middle East and Asia. (Asite has long maintained a substantial development office in Ahmedabad, and its local base will no doubt grow in the expanding Indian subcontinent market.)

Third, Belgium’s Chapoo has announced that Antwerp-based ALIAS project management consultancy has been certified as a partner for implementation services relating to its Chapoo Premium service.

Posted in AEC, Business/Financial, Collaboration, Marketing, SaaS, Vendors | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

First RICS-approved mobile survey templates exclusively delivered by Kykloud

kykloud-logo-whiteThe UK’s Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, RICS, has today launched a range of survey templates for mobile devices, exclusively delivered by the integrated surveying and asset management software vendor Kykloud.

Since its launch in early 2012, the north-east England-based business has attracted considerable attention for its time- and cost-saving asset management (post) and surveying (post) capabilities, delivered using a combination of iPad and Software-as-a-Service. Last week it was lauded for its achievements by government minister Chloe Smith at a London BIM conference.

Kykloud-ipadviewThe new RICS approved templates will enable building surveyors and other members of the profession to use mobile technology safe in the knowledge that the reports they produce meet RICS standards. The Kykloud template range includes:

  • dilapidation surveys
  • commercial building surveys
  • stock condition surveys
  • planned maintenance surveys
  • energy and carbon audits
  • housing surveys, and
  • valuation surveys.

Kykloud CEO Ed Bartlett says:

“Over the past 12 months, the benefits of mobile technology to the surveying industry have been proven repeatedly, with surveyors using iPad technology reducing surveying time by up to 50%, increasing accuracy and consistency across portfolio-wide schemes and increasing their competitiveness, resulting in more successful tenders.

“… The RICS approved template surveys will offer reassurance to individuals and organisations who are at present slightly hesitant about using mobile technology.”

The announcement coincides with a RICS conference on building surveying in London, where Kykloud is a sponsor and will be demonstrating the technology. I believe this is the first time RICS has partnered with a software vendor to deliver construction technology services; it previously developed its own online tools – eg: for e-tendering (post) and for JCT contract management (soon to be discontinued; post).

The RICS endorsement of Kykloud echoes similar arrangements elsewhere in the SaaS sector. For example, NEC contract guidelines and flowcharts have been officially licensed to SaaS construction collaboration vendors 4Projects and Conject since December 2010 (post).

Kykloud Mobile Building Surveying from kykloud on Vimeo.

Update (4.30pm, 25 April 2013) – At the invitation of Kykloud, I attended part of the RICS conference mentioned above. In between the refreshment breaks (the Kykloud stand appeared to attract a lot of interest), Ed told me that Kykloud is planning to make its application available across other mobile operating systems later this year – we talked about both Android and Microsoft Surface devices.

Posted in AEC, Business/Financial, Collaboration, Functionality, Marketing, Mobile, SaaS, Vendors | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

4Projects updates amid busy BIM babble

During a busy week of BIM-related meetings and conferences, North-East based businesses such as 4Projects and Kykloud featured several times.

Last week, I was pretty much BIM-ed out (see below), so I had to postpone a couple of blog posts until this week.

4Projects’ new release

4projects logoHaving visited Sunderland and SaaS construction collaboration vendor 4Projects last month, I was interested to read about the latest release of its online platform, announced on 16 April. According to the Viewpoint subsidiary’s news release, key enhancements include:

  • a completely redesigned Matrix Transmittal feature which provides the option to schedule a transmittal automatically at whichever time and frequency is required.  In addition, once a transmittal is created and scheduled the process of notifying the project team is now completely automated
  • an enhanced workflow process that includes a ‘weighted voting’ option.  A ‘quick vote’ feature can override a specified outcome and avoid keeping rejected documents in the workflow, saving time and providing more workflow transparency
  • a feature that makes it much easier to get documents into folders with new email drop-box functionality (developed at the request of end users). I understand that emails previously sent to the email dropbox were converted to a .pdf and all attachments were stored as separate linked items. Now the administrator can configure these emails to be stored in Microsoft’s Outlook .msg format with an option to embed attachments within the .msg file.

BIMHub competition

4Projects’ location in the north-east England BIM hotbed also led to its platform being used as the Common Data Environment for a North East BIMHub competition (news release). Teams were given eight hours to design a school and provide supporting COBie information using collaborative BIM, based on a pre-determined scope. Initial documents and drawings were distributed to teams via 4Projects, which was then used for collaboration.

The competition involved two COBie data drops: a work-in-progress update at 1pm, and a final submission at 5pm. All teams used the 4BIM tool (post) to produce COBie data for the project from their IFC files. 4BIM was also used to view and interrogate the models during judging. The winners were:

  • Best use of Interoperability – Niven
  • Best use of Visualisation – Summers-Inman
  • Best use of Asset Management – Cundall
  • Best Support to SMEs – BIM Academy
  • Overall – Summers-Inman

The Summers-Inman team included, among others, BIM consultant Rapid5D who used Vico Office (post) to move beyond 3D and provide a 4D schedule and 5D cost estimate, and, to “put the icing on the cake”: COBieUK data drops, open source validation, an environmental analysis, and a 6D model for facilities management (thanks to Rapid5D’s James Hunter for the additional information and image).
NEBimHubImage

The competition format was similar to that used in the 48-hour BuildLondonLive contests and, more recently, the BuildQatarLive competition (post) – where Asite’s cBIM platform has provided the common data environment.

BIMming around

During last week, I attended:

  • Monday’s launch of BIM4SMEs at the Building Centre, London (see Su Butcher’s Storify account) – during which there was an honourable mention by government minister Chloe Smith for another north-east England SaaS company, Kykloud (15 February post – also part of the Summers-Inman team above).
  • a meeting about integrated project insurance and BIM
  • BIMnet in London, on Monday evening
  • a Tuesday meeting in Manchester of the Constructing Excellence BIM Task Group
  • Thursday’s ThinkBIM hosted at WSP Group in Leeds, featuring Mark Bew, chair of the Government’s BIM Task Group, and BuildingSmartUK’s Nick Tune, among others (event content here), and
  • a later lecture on BIM and innovation by Mark Bew at Leeds Metropolitan University’s Rose Bowl.

Posted in AEC, BIM, Collaboration, Functionality, Marketing, SaaS, Vendors | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment